Free prototype trial on your crates this season. Request a trial
Refer a producer, get 3 months free. Refer a farm

RESOURCES

Read, watch,
and check us out.

The press our work has turned up in, the farm bill language that decides who pays for barn technology, our own video and the podcasts behind it, and the programs and organizations standing with us.

POLICY & FUNDING

Congress is rewriting who pays for barn technology

The farm bill moving through Congress would put livestock sensors on the list of equipment USDA helps a producer buy, and would raise how much of the bill it covers. None of it is law yet, so read this as the direction of travel rather than money on the table.

Bill · Passed the House

Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026

The House farm bill would let USDA cover up to 90 percent of what a producer spends adopting precision agriculture technology, against a 75 percent ceiling under current law. The provision is in Section 2202 of the conservation title.

congress.gov · H.R. 7567
Bill text · Section 2001

Livestock sensors are named in the definition

Section 2001 writes a federal definition of precision agriculture technology that lists sensors for gathering data on livestock conditions, Internet of Things devices, and data analytics software. A farrowing monitor sits inside that language.

govinfo.gov · full bill text
Reporting

The Senate draft would lend rather than cost share

DTN on the Senate version, which routes the same equipment through guaranteed conservation loans of up to 2.3 million dollars per producer, again with livestock condition sensors on the eligible list.

dtnpf.com
Analysis

How the two drafts differ

Congressional Research Service, the House and Senate farm bills set beside current law. The conservation title is where the precision agriculture money sits.

congress.gov · CRS R48918
Program

EQIP, the program all of this runs through

Cost share for conservation practices, open today at up to 75 percent. A producer applies at their local NRCS service center, and the payment goes to the farm, not to the company that made the equipment.

nrcs.usda.gov
Explainer

A plain reading of the whole bill

University of Illinois Extension walks through the farm bill title by title, for producers who want the parts that are not about sensors as well.

extension.illinois.edu

Where this stands as we write: the House passed H.R. 7567 in April 2026, the Senate Agriculture Committee did not advance its own version in August 2026, and nothing has been signed into law. Even if a bill passes, the higher rate is a ceiling the Secretary may use and not a guarantee, it applies only where the technology supports a conservation practice, and USDA would still have to write the rules first. None of this is money a farm can spend on a monitor today. We post it because it changes what one could eventually cost.

Pork-industry organizations listed here provided letters of support and survey distribution. They are not investors, customers or commercial partners. Federal programs are listed as the sources of non-dilutive grant support, not as endorsements.

Something you couldn't find?

Press kit, technical detail, research collaboration: just ask.